Appeal of CIA Denial of My FOIA Request
for a Records-Search-Fee Waiver


September 18, 2004

LW,

Where in the National Security Act of 1947 does it give authorization for the CIA to deny access to information which involves blatant, egregious acts of treason in wartime completely disregarding Presidential Directives issued during National Security Council meetings as revealed in the once top secret State Department documents discovered ON LINE on the INTERNET during the year 2000?

Sources and methods, my ass!

Nowhere in the National Security Act of 1947 is there authorization for the CIA to subvert the will of the President by conducting rogue operations in defiance of the most sensitive stated government policy which, in this case, attempted to expand the war in Vietnam into 60,000 square miles of Cambodia, continued an expressly forbidden assassination program designed to remove Norodom Sihanouk as Head of State of Cambodia and actual conspiracy to obstruct justice in a capital murder case to cover-up these treasonous acts.

The CIA cannot hide deliberate, felonious, premeditated acts behind the cloak and dagger of "national security" while at the same time committing Crimes Against Humanity in defiance of the President.

I ask that you forward this declaration to the appropriate appeals authority and demand a substantiated, detailed response to this proven evidentiary horror against the President, the People, the Constitution of The United States and the National Security Act of 1947, including myself.

I can assure you that President Harry Truman could not have envisioned such treason when he created the Agency through the National Security Act of 1947.

This information deserves the widest distribution possible, including a copy to the White House, the Senate and Congress, in order to protect themselves against repetitive actions as described above and below by our illustrious Intelligence Community and other nebulous forces that control the strings of power in this country.

We need only look at the creativity of the Gulf of Tonkin Resolution and the fabrication of WMD to justify the preemptive attack in Iraq to realize the ongoing manipulation of so called intelligence to compel aggressive war against sovereign nations in defiance of the Nuremberg edicts and the United Nations Resolutions.

It is no wonder that the United States refuses to sign and adhere to the rulings of the International Criminal Court, The Hague.

Regards.
John McCarthy

Exemptions To CIA FOIA Requests


September 18, 2004

LW, I just reviewed the Explanation of Exemptions attached to the CIA response to your FOIA request on my behalf dated September 9,2004 which I received in todays snail mail. Thank you.

Amazing as it may seem, I was unable to locate even one exemption to (il)legitimately justify a denial of any FOIA request based upon Fraud, Treason in Wartime, Conspiracy to Obstruct Justice In a Capital Murder Case, or any other felony on the part of the CIA!

Perhaps this was an oversight on the part of the over zealous care takers of the Central Intelligence Agency's minders of the secrets, sources and methods and crimes against humanity. Or perhaps they have a "classified" version of exemptions only to be viewed by those with a "need to know" behind closed door, you know, for "eyes only"

. I'm positive a preeminent attorney would see the same glaring omissions as I.

Bests,
John

US Detention Facilities


September 17, 2004

Hello, I noted in the media news that Judge Hellerstein has ordered all reports on prison abuses re Abu Ghraib, et al, be turned over to plaintiffs within thirty days. Judge Hellerstein's office directed my attention to the Law Firm Gibbons Del Deo and I was subsequently provided with your email address by Lorraine of your firm.

I do believe there is a pattern here in the matter of Human Rights Abuses in the military prison and detentions facilities that spans years if not decades. If you wish to use this material in your instant case re these abuses, feel free to do so.

Yesterday, I sent an email to Amnesty International Headquarters in London, England, as suggested by the AI office in New York. See below.

September 16, 2004

Greetings Amnesty International.

The following URL's will serve as background for the attempts to obstruct justice in a capital murder case while incarcerating me in virtually complete isolation, in violation of Human Rights Statutes, from November 26, 1967 until April 4th, 1968, in a 5 x 7 foot wooden box serving as a cell in the maximum security compound at the Long Binh Detention Facility in Long Binh, Vietnam during war time in a war zone; a violation in and of itself. The attack on Long Binh during the Tet Offensive of January 30, 1968, proves this point.

I was further incarcerated in the US Military Penitentiary, formerly called the United States Disciplinary Barracks, USDB, at Fort Leavenworth, Kansas from April 7, 1968 until October 6, 1969.

I was then released from incarceration pending appeal and assigned as the Operations Officer of the Combat Surveillance School, still under charges of premeditated murder, and without a security clearance. The URL's below fill in the gaps.

http://www.fromthewilderness.com/free/hall/Mac.html
http://www.geocities.com/larryjodaniel/17.html
http://www.spiritone.com/~pazuu/pow-mia/JohnMcCarthy.htm

Maximum Security Compound Facility, Long Binh South Vietnam, November 26, 1967-April 4, 1968:

The Maximum Security Compound was located inside the Military Prison Facility which housed approximately 800 American Military prisoners charged, awaiting court-martial, convicted and awaiting prison shipment to the United States for further incarceration. The "Max" was enclosed in triple concertina wire, topped with razor wire, measuring approximately 150 x 150 feet in area guarded by military police at the entrance to the "Max" and covered by two machine gun towers on either side of the compound.

The cells in the U shaped configured Maximum Security Compound, numbering approximately fifty, were enclosed on four sides by two-inch thick oak prefab construction with a 5 x 7 inch window covered with re-bar and mesh screen for observation of inmates, a heavy duty chicken wire suspended from the top of the box above which a continuous burning light bulb was suspended. All of this was covered by a tin roof, which radiated heat down into the cells. Air was circulated through the cells by gaps in between the tin roof and the tops of the cells, allowing red laterite dust to coat the interiors mixed with humidity and perspiration resulting in a constant red muck covering bodies of the inmates. There were no toilet facilities nor running water in any of these cells. Individuals were occasionally escorted to outhouses to relieve themselves in an environment totally avoided by the Military Police Guards. Many of the inmates in the "Max" had syphilis and other contagious venereal diseases which exposed all other inmates who used these latrine facilities.

Inmates were fed by common service trays usually kicked through slots cut into the bottoms of the cell door. Liquid refreshment became mixed with the meager food rations during this process.

Inmates were escorted individually once or twice per week to a shower room adjacent to the cells.

Some prisoners were observed to suffer abuse in the form of beatings with swagger sticks carried and administered by the prison commandant. These prisoners were obviously going insane due to their behavior of playing with their own feces and lack of attention to their constant pleas to relieve themselves. Attempts to provide these abusive assaults on inmates was thwarted by JAG Attorneys who often visited inmates with the excuse that "you don't want to rock the boat". One of these attorneys is currently a sitting judge in Northern Virginia.

These inhumane conditions resulted in not just a few inmates going mad from the heat, humidity and isolation, all conditions in violations of human rights. Some were subsequently rendered unconscious with medication, placed in white straight jackets and removed from the Max never to be seen again.

Fortunately, there is no statute of limitations on these crimes against humanity.

I swear that the above is true, witnessed by myself and that I observed these conditions while incarcerated although innocent of any and all charges fabricated against me in a conspiracy to obstruct justice in a capital murder case to cover-up treason in wartime by the President's closest advisors.

John McCarthy

Pearl Harbor- Day of Deceit


September 15, 2004

Hello Mr. Stinnett,

Zan Overall phoned me earlier this week re the meeting last night in Los Angeles with Jim Maars attending a presentation of a video and book signing. Unfortunately, I was unable to attend.

Zan brought up your name and the title of your book "Day of Deceit" which I have yet to read although I have seen the shinning reviews.

I mentioned to Zan that I had a copy of LOOK MAGAZINE dated September 9, 1941 with an article on how and why the US would suffer a sneak attack by Japanese forces at Pearl Harbor launched from aircraft carriers in the Pacific Northwest of Hawaii.

I saw the report of Mike Ruppert's presentation before the San Francisco Commonwealth Club on August 31, 2004 and his naming of VP Cheney as the mass murderer of 9/11. His comments on the similarity between the attack on Pear Harbor and 9/11 has been met with bold denials from those who would prefer not to have a commonality between the two; IE, the veritable right wingers and neo-conservatives.

I do believe the report in LOOK MAGAZINE offers prima fascia evidence that the planned attack at Pearl Harbor was well known to the entire world well in advance. There must have been a gnashing of teeth in both Washington and Tokyo when less than ninety days before December 7, 1941 this damning report was available to all.

Can you imagine the reaction of the Japanese Imperial Navy whose Top Secret plans for a pre-emptive strike against the United States at Pearl Harbor was compromised in a widely read weekly publication?

As Mr. Ruppert's book, Crossing The Rubicon, gathers numbers in distribution there will no doubt be further controversy on the nexus of Pearl Harbor and 9/11.

Hopefully, the article in LOOK will add credence to both Day Of Deceit and Crossing The Rubicon.

As the controversy grows and the election nears, I plan to offer this original article for bid on Ebay, I do believe this may be the lone copy known to exist. If so, it is the single, proven, irrefutable link to the subterfuge at the beginning of WWII for the United States.

Regards,
John McCarthy

The Draft


September 14, 2004

The War in Iraq will require a DRAFT! The back door method of turning around organizations for multiple trips with an ever increasing rise in casualties and attacks will soon require the DRAFT to supplement our dwindeling resources, BUT ONLY AFTER THE INAUGURATION!!!! In the meanwhile, we have hunkered our troops down to become stationary target of ever increasing mortar attacks in the Green Zone and elsewhere in Iraq. 87 Attacks per day for the month of August! WOW! This ain't slowin' down.

But back to the DRAFT.

How to avoid it!

Don't ask, don't tell will get you deferred...figure it out.

Once in, confess to being an alcoholic. They will put you into rehab. Miss one meeting and you are history! And out of the service!

Refuse to take the oath of enlistment because you don't want to forfeit your First Amendment Rights. No one can force you to do that! See the Feres Doctrine http://www.verpa.org

Right now, student organizations around the country are mobilizing to get the word out to all 18-34 men and women, and those in High School who will soon be eligible for the Draft once they turn 18 on the above choices to avoid the Draft or if Drafted, to get tossed out without going to jail.

Without the resources realized from the upcoming Draft, those who volunteer won't be able to handle the requirements. Plans in the Pentagon RELY on Draft numbers to fill the units required in the Plans.

Bests,
John

Nuclear Weapons Labs Hijacked
by Admiral Inman and Carlyle


September 10, 2004

Okay, Gents and Gals, I just perused this material and I am at a loss. Help me to focus on just what the hell we have here and what do we do about it!

Could it be that the diabolical minds at Carlyle who are attempting to take over the control of the nuclear weapons labs from USC have "created" the security breaches at Los Alamos and Lawrence Livermore to discredit those currently in charge and under contract in order to wrestle away the control and wealth of the nuclear weapons manufacturing of the United States for nefarious reasons?

Your comments are appreciated! You may Cc them to Leuren as well.

Bests,
John

I have said before that Vietnam was about oil. Note David Rockefellers comments at the end of this article.

Leuren

Rant
Deliberate EUGENIC RADIATION POISONING
of 100,000+ Sephardi/Yemeni by Israel/U.S. in 1950s



September 9, 2004

oh my God....

http://portland.indymedia.org/en/2004/08/295000.shtml

After the Holocaust I felt ashamed to call myself German now I feel ashamed to call myself Human

Traude

September 9, 2004

Traude,

Those fateful words spoken at the International War Crimes Tribunal in Nuremberg will now be tested not only against the crimes against humanity by the American aggression in Afghanistan and Iraq, but also against the Israeli/American collusion on these experiments resulting in further crimes against humanity.

"WE MUST NEVER FORGET THAT THE RECORD ON WHICH WE JUDGE THESE DEFENDANTS TODAY IS THE RECORD ON WHICH HISTORY WILL JUDGE US TOMORROW.

"These defendants were of a station and rank which does not soil it's own hands with blood. They were men who knew how to use lesser folks as tools. We want to reach the planners and designers, the inciters and leaders without whose evil architecture the would would not have for so long scourged with the violence and wracked with agonies and convulsions of this terrible war." --Robert Jackson, Chief Prosecutor At Nuremberg and United States Supreme Court Justice.

These words of wisdom which elicited the death penalty for the great majority of the defendants at Nuremberg applies to the radiological experimentation of children by the Israeli/American effort of the 1950's, a few scant years after WWII, up to and including Vietnam and the Death, Rape and Torture committed by Americans at Abu Ghraib, Baghdad, Iraq.

There must be a purpose in the revelations of these crimes against humanity. Where is the guidance and who has the authority? Certainly not the USA. Is this not a case for the International Criminal Court, The Hague?

Is this the hidden, secret agenda for America's refusal to sign the International Treaty on War Crimes at the Hague?

Bests,
John

Greetings,

There appears to be a continuous pattern of covert conspiracy to thwart our Constitution with actual treason in wartime focusing on manipulation of events for the justification for preemptive attacks on sovereign nations.

Once top secret documents of the National Security Council have been declassified by the State Department in 2000, much to the chagrin of the CIA. Now we know why; treason in wartime. The documents are available in the following URL.

The nexus for the treason is located in the following URL's.

http://www.fromthewilderness.com/free/hall/Mac.html
http://www.geocities.com/larryjodaniel/17.html

What do the following have in common: Gulf of Tonkin Resolution, 9/11, WMD in Iraq and the fabrication of "intelligence" presented to the House, Senate and the UN. and the acts of treason above coupled with conspiracy to obstruct justice in a capital murder case to cover-up the treason?

All of these matters were manipulated by the so called "Intelligence Community" who operate at the pleasure of the President. Or so we thought. These high crimes and treason remain untouchable as evidenced by the non response of letters sent to Senators in the Senate Select Committee on Intelligence and the Attorney General of The United States.

When President Johnson found out that his directives issued during National Security Council meetings were blatantly disregarded during wartime, he announced he would not seek nor accept his parties nomination for the Presidency in 1968. That's how serious these treasonous acts were and are.

The documents don't lie, and the media remains blind. So, who has the moral courage to expose those who control the "Intelligence Community" and bring our aggressor nation into check before someone nukes us in retaliation for preemptive attacks formulated on fabricated information known to the world but propagandized to the American Public for nefarious reasons?

Regards,
John McCarthy

Nukes and Secret Stuff


September 7, 2004

Good 'ol Harry dropped the bomb, twice. Justified or not, the targets were civilians. But the victors makes the rules! Ever get the feeling that someday, somehow that rationalization is gonna come back and bite us in the ass?

Talk at the time was that Harry did not even know about the Manhattan Project when FDR was alive.

Other posts have been made with respect to the mystery of the death of the President in April, 1945.

Funny, though, how all the equipment stockpiled on Okinawa for the push into Japan in case the bomb failed to function was distributed 50/50 to Korea and Vietnam the day the surrender documents were signed on the Missouri. This begs the question; "Who knew that five years later war would break out in 1950 in Korea and Vietnam?"

Did Harry know? I doubt it.

Bests,
John

Rant


September 7, 2002

Well, well!

Now we know who the Republican Party will choose to counter Mr. Ruppert's points from his presentation naming VP Cheney as a mass murderer of 3000 on 9/11!

And the main argument for proof that Mike Ruppert's allegations are false is that I, John McCarthy no longer post information in support!

What wonderful deductive reasoning! I can hardly wait for all the boys and girls to gather around the political fires and listen to the debate before the powers to be....should be very interesting to watch such incompetence in action! Bring your barf bags, it could get a little bumpy.

Any suggestions for a forum for Mr Ruppert and the all knowing one?

Are you baiting and flaming me with your vile accusations and phony logic, boy?

Bests,
John

Extending The Axis Of Evil?

September 6, 2004

Administration hawk warns of further "preemption"

http://www.informationclearinghouse.info/article6865.htm

Hombres y Senoritas,

Bullets anyone?

Bests,
John

Cheney And 9/11

September 5, 2004

In a court of law, a witness caught in a lie can be assumed to have lied on every other bit of testimony if the judge so rules on the question of truth and veracity.

Whether or not Ruppert's allegation against Cheney is subject to the same scrutiny is quite a stretch and damn laughable.

(Ruppert Names Cheney Prime Suspect In 911 Mass Murders 9-2-4

"I will name Richard Cheney as the prime suspect in the mass murders of 9/11 and will establish that, not only was he a planner in the attacks, but also that on the day of the attacks he was running a completely separate Command, Control and Communications system which was superceding any orders being issued by the NMCC [National Military Command Center], or the White House Situation Room." -- Michael Ruppert )

Google as an authority? Google has chosen to post libelous comments about me but does that make it true? Of course not!

Your political skirts are showing along with your prejudice for anything anti administration, Hatrack. Why don't you address the issues in Ruppert's allegations instead of ducking into google? The information was posted for you to decipher, have you even read it? If so, what are your conclusions?

This ain't no pissin' contest. Put up or forget about it and let someone else tackle the issue if your moral courage is lacking.

Have a nice day!

Bests,
John

Since this is all part of the 9/11 tragedy, and the cover-up, it is quite appropriate to place this information as additional information in Iran-Contra II since it goes to the root matter.

Bests,
John


For those of you who don't know, the money that went to the two hijackers in San Diego came directly from Princess Haifa, the wife of the Saudi Ambassador to the US, Prince Bandar. Bandar is referred to by the Bush family as "Bandar Bush" since they have been close for years. The account that Princess Haifa used to send the money was from Riggs Bank in Washington D.C. President Bush's uncle Jonathan Bush just happened to be the CEO of Riggs Bank at the time. I'm sure thats why the investigation was blocked and the pages redacted from the Congressional Joint Inquiry into 9-11.

Allan

http://www.miami.com/mld/miamiherald/9584265.htm

Posted on Sun, Sep. 05, 2004
Graham book: Inquiry into 9/11, Saudi ties blocked
By FRANK DAVIES
fdavies@herald.com

(More BS from Sen. Hatrack here)

From John again- Well, I guess that's it folks, case closed, just like Michael Baden said, just a bunch of conspiracy nuts. Padded cells notwithstanding, I guess we can forget about the collusion of the investigators on the 9/11 Commission to OMIT the very evidence Ruppert has brought forth. But never mind, it don't mean nothin'! No big deal.

Well, I guess that's it folks, case closed, just like Michael Baden said, just a bunch of conspiracy nuts. Padded cells notwithstanding, I guess we can forget about the collusion of the investigators on the 9/11 Commission to OMIT the very evidence Ruppert has brought forth. But never mind, it don't mean nothin'! No big deal.

If Ruppert's report didn't stand the test of time, do you think the Commonwealth Club of San Francisco would have invited him to speak? Use your google search engine and FIND OUT about the Club, Hatrack!

As to why the Dem's haven't jumped all over this, how do you know they are not researching the allegations right friggin' now? Assumption being the muther of all screw-ups, I fear you know not of what you speak. That's about as civil as it get, buddy!

No, Hatrack, ask not who the padded cells wait for, they wait for thee!

I assume you took off your administrative enforcement mantel before you honored us with your opinion on a matter you haven't even read. If you had read it, you would haver reach conclusions that other reasonable men and women have instead of rejecting the issue outright with google gaggle. Shame on you!

Re the code being broken, I guess it was just pure luck on the part of the US Navy that the Aircraft Carriers based at Pear Harbor were put to sea two days before Dec. 7, 1941, to test the new paint jobs in the waters waaaaaaaaaaaaaay east of Hawaii....much to the chagrin of the Zero pilots who noted such upon their arrival that the carriers were gone! Just pure luck, don't you think? Probably had nada to do with the fact they were irreplaceable, unlike the Battleships.

Pearl Harbor, Gulf of Tonkin, 9/11, WMD in Iraq; what do they have in common, boys and girls???

Bests,
John

Bill, We Wish You Well


by jmac1369 at 02:11PM (CDT) on Sep 4, 2004

Mr. Clinton,

Had a stent put in two years ago this month. All is well, as will be with you. Obviously, your blockage is greater than mine and in more places. I had no pain indicator, just shortness of breath. An enterprising nurse drew blood from an artery and found gas indicative of a heart problem. Doing nine miles a day on the sand in Santa Monica made me a candidate for a drop dead heart attack. Lucky me, and you!

Sure feels weird when they shoot that juice into your chest to take the pix. Like the attendant told me, "This is going to feel like you just downed a shot of good vodka". Indeed it did!

I wrote in November '97 by email re "An American POW, In America" and you turned that over to JAG for resolution. I ended up in Federal District Court with a $1.3 Billion dollar civil suit that was dismissed with prejudice re the Feres Doctrine.

As President and Chairman of the Board of VERPA, Veterans Equal Rights Protection Advocacy, http://www.verpa.org I have been instrumental in the motion to abolish the Feres Doctrine at the Senate Judiciary level where it remains stonewalled although the wording has been approved.

We have resorted to inquiring of the ICC at the Hague to protect the Constitution. They have agreed to hear our argument.

In the interim, I have a Petition to impanel a Federal Grand Jury to Probe the CIA for Treason In Wartime and Conspiracy to Obstruct Justice In a Capital Murder Case to cover-up the treason.

In October, 2000 once top secret National Security Council documents declassified by the State Department were located on the Internet much to the chagrin of the CIA. Now we know why; treason in wartime.

http://www.geocities.com/larryjodaniel/17.html
http://www.fromthewilderness.com/free/hall/Mac.html
http://www.spiritone.com/~pazuu/pow-mia/JohnMcCarthy.htm

Get well, we're counting on your quick recovery and influence in the next two months!

Best Regards and thanks for your assistance.

John McCarthy
Los Angeles, CA

Terrorism


September 4, 2004

During the cold war (sorry to be so friggin ancient) the bogeyman was "communism". That scare tactic came to the forefront with Joe McCarthy, no relation, and the propaganda effort on the part of OUR Government to frighten the population and focus their anger AWAY from the ineptness and backlash from WWII.

Now we have al Quaida as the bogeyman. Not Iraq, although that is the dichotomy. al Quaida is the bad ass lurking behind every and all bad things happening in the the world, yes the WORLD!

Reality tells us the Iraqi do not like occupation one bit. They have accepted our mantra, "give me liberty or give me death". Would Americans not be just as adamant and vicious to any 'occupier' here to shove a foreign brand of democracy down our throats?

(It's nothing to do with oil...just ask Haliburton)

As soon as the world economy is based on the Euro rather than the dollar, the sparks will fly. In fact, during the year before the Iraq preemptive attack, Saddam converted all available dollars into Euros. What does that say?

Give us a new bogey man. How about North Korea or Iran (lots of oil and nukes, too)

Whar is OBL? How quick we forget out lies of a year ago....

Bests,
John

Terrorism is phase one of "unconventional warfare" or "guerrilla warfare" according to the United States Special Warfare mantra.

Terror, as used by a guerrilla force, led by American Special Forces, if you will, was a BIG secret in the early sixties, but practiced and taught in the SW Schools. "When in Rome...."

So, when we go into such a huff about the war on terrorism, al Qaida and the rest of the current bogey men, we must realize this is all part of the responsibility of us training them! We obviously did a very good job over the past 45 years or so. We had SF teams in virtually every country in the middle east for ten damn years! What do you expect? (Sorry to be so friggin ancient in my subject matter) Now, if our past foreign policy started by our State Department, CIA and "others" has come back to bite us in the ass then who should we blame, OBL whom we trained to begin with, and did a damn fine job, evidently?

Ah, yes, terrorism is nasty business that we helped out of the genie bottle and now must live with it. What arrogant as*holes we are!

Solution? Back off, back down, get out, lick our wounds and forget about being the worlds policeman; they have us outgunned, and out manned and THEY believe in what they are fighting for, their own freedom, not ours and not the oil we want. They have umpteen million to throw into the breach...what do we have!!??

As they say in New York, fuggetaboutit!

Bests,
John

History is a pain in the ass, isn't it?

September 3, 2004

I hear allot about "we are interested in the news of the present, not the past." That is understandable. Current events have much more flavor than ten, twenty or thirty or even fifty years ago. How about seventy?

Why do we still have trials of Gestapo prison guards being brought forth for crimes against humanity in Dachau, Coblintz, Belsen-Belsen and the other concentration camps of Nazi Germany only to be deported from the United States?

Should the victims of Eichmann not have testified at his trial in Israel in 1962 because the activities of his brutality were "old news", from 25 years earlier?

Should the victims of Pol Pot and the Khmer Rouge be told to be quiet because the crimes against their relatives was thirty years old?

Who on this board can say they would not take advantage of the fact that there is no statute of limitations on the murder of their loved ones?

This morning I saw in print with my own eyes and again late this afternoon that CHB is NOT interested in crimes of the past, only crimes of today! That was in reference to Senator Kerry, but it affects me. Am I supposed to turn the other cheek, shut up and not point out that our "intelligence community" defied a President in wartime and thereby committed treason? What the hell, you say, that was forty damn years ago!

The International War Crimes Tribunal in the Hague would beg to differ with you!

Hey, CHB is your program and you set the standards. But you might want to take another good look at your Freedom Of Speech mantra in your header. Perhaps it should read "we are interested in Freedom of Speech on current events only--don't bother us with old crap".

Is there one among you that I fought and nearly died for that can tell me to forget about what makes we what I am today? Makes me want to tell you that history is repeating itself with lies and treason to take our country to war with fabricated "intelligence"; makes me want to warn you that our government is repeating the sins of the past in allowing the so called "intelligence community" to manipulate what is known to the rest of the world as an excuse to gain control of so much oil.

All of this information is certainly debatable, but it is not dated. What happened forty years ago in the Gulf of Tonkin has happened again in the WMD of Iraq. These are examples of manipulation of information by the "intelligence community" for political ends, war, the extension of politics, not to mention an ego or two.

I think there should be a definitive ruling with respect to what is old news and what is new.

Should there be a cutoff date?

Should we not have our daily Round Table point out the facts of history, some hundreds of years old, and be able to relate to them as how they affect us today?

Have a nice, quiet weekend. And don't even think about what your in line for. Forget the past, indeed. America's enemies are counting on it. How do we spell hypocrisy? Rant on!

Bests,
John

Topic: Was Ist Uber Alles?


September 3, 2004

Gott mit uns: On Bush and Hitler’s rhetoric:

When was the last time a Western nation had a leader so obsessed with God and claiming God was on our side? If you answered Adolph Hitler and Nazi Germany, you’re correct.

http://www.informationclearinghouse.info/article6838.htm

Well, well. What have we here, mein Herr?

Bests,

John


AHA! I just found the warning not to compare President Bush to Hitler! Thanks, Lonesome Hawk. I will make sure to copy this and send it as an example of what RR has evolved into because of YOU!

I am just the messenger! I posted an article from informationclearinghouse that has nada to do with anything I said, just someone else's opinion.

Now, thanks for the warning. Do you recall the Gestapo tactics that were used to burn the books because of ideas and not libel, name calling or ideas of sedition? You're convoluted reasoning in overstepping your moderator boundaries because of personal feelings on any subject is reprehensible at best. Your past rulings on topics YOU don't want to see on RR because they are "false, because you have no proof" just shows to go ya, you can't handle anything you personally disagree with. Badge heavy is dangerous. You have become what you hate so much, a Nazi. While Doug is making up his mind, hear this.

If I was writing your efficiency report it would read as follows. "This officer constantly fails to meet the low standards he sets for himself".

Further, I outrank you, so lock your heels, sailor!

Now, you want to kick me, go for it. But there will be enough here to read this before you do.

It's been fun, all. Remember, never trust anyone who has spent too much time at sea, doing his own laundry and screwing each other. It warps their mind, don't ya see? So much for freedom of speech--should be removed from the header of RR.

Bests,
John

The War on Terror is a Fraud


September 2, 2004

That the war abroad is to go on in perpetuum against a “shadowy” and “dark” enemy is no accident or blunder. What better method of keeping the populace timid and tame for as long as is desired? http://www.dissidentvoice.org/Sept04/Alam0901.htm

BOO! Are you scared yet?

Bests,
John

Republicans, afraid of terror?


Nah! Young Republicans support Iraq war, but not all are willing to join the fight
http://www.informationclearinghouse.info/article6841.htm

lucy, say it isn't so....

Bests,
John

War on Terror!

How Soon Will the U.S. or Israel Bomb Iran?

The President of the United States has branded Iran part of the "Axis of Evil." He has demanded that Iran "abandon her nuclear ambitions." He has claimed the right to wage pre-emptive war against any enemy he chooses. http://www.truthout.org/docs_04/090204A.shtml

Place your bets! Will this be the October Surprise?

Bests,
John

Fight terror on all fronts


In Iraq, Americans have killed about 19,000 people so far, including 13,000 civilians. That's one of the main reasons for the steady rise in terrorism http://tinyurl.com/5ysgz

Happened in 'Nam, is happening in Iraq.

Surprise? NO! Stupid. Bests, John

Rants


September 1, 2004

As I read the above posts with great interest and respect for those who had the opportunity to observe from within what I observed at the pointy end of things, I must conclude, re my other posts on the so called Intelligence Community, that it matters not who is President re Foreign Policy, Defense, Offense, or long term goals for "Democracy", it is those who control the "Intel Community" who pull the strings, damn the Constitution as it truly must be a myth of our imagination, or at least a figmo. What looks good on paper, ain't necessarily what's happening in the Church of whats happening now. The diabolicals are loose!
http://www.ratical.org/ratville/JFK/ST/ST.html

Here is the bible, boys and girls, and it's a FREE download! But it's up to you to read it...

I'd be very interested in your take on this book. BTW, our government saw fit to remove 100,000 copies from the bookstore shelves of the land of the free and home of the brave...

Bests,
John


The motto: "And the truth shall set you free..." must be scraped from the halls and walls of the Wiffenpoof's playground at Langley.

Hypocrisy personified and prostitution reigns. Selling ones soul for Democracy is blow back big time, especially when the real truth comes home to roost. (sources and methods, YEE HAW)

Seems to me the only reason the Pentagon was a target for 9/11 was that CIA HQ had more traitors on the job, known only to the perps of 9/11, and I wonder who's Kissinger now??? Henry, are you listening?

Bests,
John


I can just see the Saturday night Specials plus the real arsenal of Amerika hitting the streets to greet the forces of "Democracy" who come to save us from ourselves!

Another good reason not to tell us all that happens in Iraq, we might learn something about resisting occupation.....

Bests,
John

You don't have to know or even like someone to vote for them.


August 23, 2004

You don't have to hate someone to kill them, either. I never knew the men I killed, who, in turn, were trying to kill me. They didn't know me either. I didn't know any of the thousands I called in B-52 strikes on. "We have met the enemy and he is us".... Author Unknown.

So, how much easier should it be to off someone who really pisses you off? Now there is a dichotomy! Talk about justification and hypocrisy!! "Thou shalt not kill, unless the SOB is trying to kill you". For what?

War being the extention of politics, we deserve answers to these and other questions before the next trigger is pulled. Wake up, boys and girls!

Vote for who? Why?

Bests,
John

DU


http://www.sfbayview.com/081804/Depleteduranium081804.shtml



August 22, 2004

Dear Sandy,

Good on YOU!

I am very interested in the response to your presentation of the views of Leuren Moret at your meeting today. Thank you for conveying these most important ideas and facts.

I am very interested in the response to your presentation of the views of Leuren Moret at your meeting today. Thank you for conveying these most important ideas and facts. Leuren and I are of the mind that it is totally possible that a diabolical plot has been hatched and is being carried out with the full knowledge and not so subtle acquiescence of the current and former members of the Intelligence Community in the end results of the use of Depleted Uranium as an "area deniability" weapon which had its birth pains in the Manhattan Project in 1943.

DU is omnicidal. It kills everything. All plants, the food chain, and humans by virulent cancers and horribly crippled offspring generated by defective genes contaminated with radiation poisoning with no anti-dote anywhere on the horizon. Most of the population living within 1000 miles of Kabul, Afghanistan, and Baghdad, Iraq have been inhaling gas particles of DU for the last sixteen months. Seasonally, the winds pick up the nano-sized particles (billionth of a meter) and disperse them on the wind to others not yet contaminated. In not too many years, the land will be uninhabitable without specifically designed garments which will allow for the short term maintenance of the soon to be installed automated oil production and transport facilities without the fear of interruption by sabotage or other disruption.

Our best minds MUST have seen the potential of the diabolical solution for controlling the massive amounts of oil in the Mid-East.

Democracy is an opaque facade. A lame excuse for our existence while the scam of DU is unfolding before our eyes.

Leuren's article gives us a view of the real numbers and allows us to imagine, with sureness, the disaster to the populations of Iraq and Afghanistan and the surrounding countries. Not to mention the deadly exposure to all of our troops....and the folks who planned this war KNEW the consequences prior to the preemptive attack in 2003. They had all the casualty reports from Desert Shield and subsequent effects of "Gulf War Syndrome" to focus their foreknowledge of what was going to occur. Military planning provides for contingencies and anticipation of results. It has always been part of the system. It is not deniable.

The rest of the world is not asleep on this issue. In 2003 The Japanese International Criminal Court indicted President Bush for Crimes against Humanity for dropping hundreds of tons of Depleted Uranium on Kabul, Afghanistan.

Bests,
John

Veterans Equal Rights Protection Advocacy, Inc.


~VERPA~ P.O. Box 8225, Medford, OR 97504-0225
"Veterans &Families For Equal Justice Under Law" Inc.
December 1999

Chairman: John McCarthy (CA) * Founder/Executive Director: Jeffrey A. Trueman (PA) Legislative Coordinator: Barbara Cragnotti (OR) * VA Abuse Coordinator: Susan Bauer (IL) Human Rights Coordinator: Rusty Rustan (CA) * Legal Coordinator: Misha Coale (VA) Gulf War S/I Coordinator: Robert J. Jones (NC) * PR Coordinator: Renee Thurlow (MI) National Security Coordinator: Mark Zeller (GA) Web site: http://www.verpa.org

August 22, 2004

Dear VERPA Supporters:
As most of you receiving this letter know, VERPA has worked tremendously hard to introduce our proposed legislation entitled The Military and Veterans Equal Rights Protection Act - (VERPA Act) especially since the October 8, 2002, Senate Judiciary Hearings were held to address the Feres Doctrine (hereinafter Feres).

Long before the hearings held October 8, 2002 and up through August 9, 2004, we have worked with Senator Arlen Specters staff to remedy Feres without disrupting good order and discipline in our military. Unfortunately, our good faith legislative efforts have been stalled by Senator Specters office after an indication was given that the language of our proposed legislation was approved by legal counsel. We emphasize stalled because each day Feres remains the law of the land, continued injuries or death to our service members having no legitimate military necessity will continue under the unconstitutional Feres judicial body of law until Congress stops this. We must band together to compel our government to remedy the Feres issue.

Overview

We write this letter from the deepest parts of our hearts and souls with the genuine concern if we, as American military, veterans and families, do not all pull together at this critical juncture, we will not remedy the Feres issues by the end of this 108th Congress. With the pending Presidential election and the pending military draft being considered, the time to end 54 years of injustice due to Feres is now.

In the wake of the stalled effort, due to Senator Specters inaction, VERPA is faced with the reality that our solely funded status cannot continue. We need the help of ALL veterans and their families who seek redress of a service-connected wrongful act or omission of a federal employee allowed by the Feres Doctrine

. As you read this update letter we hope you will make a monetary donation to help us defray the cost to keep VERPAs legislation and our fight to abolish Feres alive. If each reader of this letter sends $1.00 (one dollar) that would help tremendously. Please send what you can. Donations to VERPA, Inc. are not tax deductible. For those who have already contributed we thank you! For the record, all Board and Officers, past and present in VERPA have expended an estimated $100,000 of our own assets in an effort to abolish the Feres Doctrine and seek justice for all. We should note, that in the past many Citizens have offered to provide VERPA with a donation due to the important nature of our work but we kindly did not accept until we felt our legislation truly spoke for all military, veterans and families. We know at this time the VERPA Act speaks on behalf of all victims of Feres.

VERPA Advisory Opinion Request

To counter Senator Specters failure to act and prevent known abuses under Feres, on August 9, 2004 we undertook an unprecedented legal maneuver. We filed a letter with the International Criminal Court (ICC) and requested an Advisory Opinion based on the following question: Does the United States Supreme Court decision entitled the "Feres Doctrine" allow United States federal government employees to engage in human and civil rights abuses in violation of the United States Constitution and International Law? If you and/or someone you know would like a copy of our Open Letter we filed with the ICC, please contact us at verpalegislative@aol.com and write "Open Letter" on the subject line. We will send our next update after we receive an answer from the ICC advising if we can proceed with a formal petition or not. Jeff, VEPRAs Founder is preparing to attend the CICC Conference at The Hague the week of September 5, 2004. There will be 150 Nation members in attendance so our injustices can be exposed around the world if we pull together to advocate the abuses we are facing. In the interim we are planning to establish our Home Office in Washington, D.C. in furtherance of our legislation to abolish Feres.

The Feres Doctrine Resolution

VERPA formed as an umbrella organization with the hope to unite all military, veterans and their families who reasonably believe they have been denied equal justice due to Feres. Obviously, VERPA believes Feres is the NUMBER ONE enemy of all Americans serving the Country as ALL issues of injury or injustice denied redress by our government fall under this judge made law. We can only state: our Justice Department must prosecute individuals who commit crimes against Americans serving the Nation rather than defending crimes against humanity and constitutional rights abuses under Feres.

For those who do not know it, Feres is Sovereign Immunity and no where in our Constitution is sovereign immunity legal.

In the wake of the stalled legislation to remedy Feres, we now must proceed with a formal Resolution to obtain the signatures of all organizations or individual military or veterans rights advocates, to show we stand united under the Feres abolishment banner. Therefore, we are preparing a Resolution to obtain an accurate accounting of all those who believe Feres is the primary reason why our First Amendment right to petition our Federal Courts for redress of grievances is denied. If you would like to sign our Resolution, please contact us at verpalegislative@aol.com and write "VERPA Resolution" on the subject line.

We Will Still Accept Cases - Only Via Our On-Line Petition

Over the 4 years VERPA has been incorporated, we have exhausted considerable resources and time performing case work in support of our legislative efforts without asking for any donations. Again, at this time, we can no longer perform case work; however we will continue to accept cases via our on-line petition found on our Home page at www.verpa.org.

As a group of 9 American families who make up VERPA Board and Officers, we fully intend to proceed to the ICC to redress our injustices and hope you will join with us. If you wish to send your case to us for presentation to the ICC, please forward a one-page summary of the facts and circumstances supporting your injustice, along with a minimum of a $5.00 (five dollar) fee to defray the cost of processing your case. For all those who have all ready donated to VERPA, Inc. please send us your one page summary.

Conclusion

We appreciate all who have donated to date and thank you for keeping the fight alive to abolish the Feres Doctrine.

In summary, we can abolish the Feres Doctrine with your help! The proposed legislation we have constructed, on behalf of all military, veterans and families can be introduced if we prove to Congress we all stand together.

Best wishes,
/s/ Barb Cragnotti
VERPA Legislative Coordinator/Treasurer
On Behalf of VERPA BOD/Officers
P.S. If you believe our work to be credible and for the good of all military/veterans and families, please make your check payable to: VERPA, Inc. and mail it to: VERPA, P O Box 8225, Medford, OR 97504-0225

Upon receipt of your donation, we will forward a Notice of Receipt to you.

Request for a HQDA I.G. Investigation into the McCarthy Saga


TO: Inspector General
Headquarters, U. S. Department of the Army
Washington, DC 20310

FROM: Larry W. Bryant
3518 Martha Custis Drive
Alexandria, VA 22302

DATE: August 19, 2004

Based on the enclosed affidavit from former U. S. Army captain John Joseph McCarthy, Jr., of Los Angeles, Calif., I, a retired civilian member of the "Total Army," hereby request that your office conduct an immediate, comprehensive investigation into the events, policies, practices, and principals surrounding this unresolved case of official treachery and treason to which Mr. McCarthy bears witness -- a case that not only has ruined the military career of a model intelligence officer but also has left a seemingly indelible black mark upon the entire U. S. intelligence community.

The cited CIA-Army criminality -- including treasonous activity in war time, fraud upon the court, gross abuse of authority, and the official cover-up thereof -- evident from Mr. McCarthy's careful compilation of available evidence gives you no recourse but to conduct the sought-for investigation and to issue a full report thereof to the public.

Of course, your choosing not to take this requested action certainly will prolong the effects of the wrongful prosecution and fraudulent character disparagement of Mr. McCarthy; and your rejection of this request will cast your office as an accomplice in that ongoing travesty of justice and in its related cover-up.

When John McCarthy drew upon his innate bravery and commitment to public service during his tour of duty in Vietnam, little did he suspect that, decades later, he'd have to apply that same degree of bravery and idealism toward achieving victory over a domestic adversary lurking behind the cover of the U. S. flag and beneath the eagle of U. S. military authority. You, sir, now hold in your hands the key to McCarthy's vindication -- and to assuring full accountability from the perpetrators/perpetuators of his grievance. Please at least match his exemplary moral courage and commitment by fulfilling this request as soon as possible.

Furthermore, I ask that you promptly identify for me the I.G. case officer to whom you're assigning this matter -- so that I may arrange a personal meeting with him/her by which I may deliver some of the McCarthy-acquired documentation supporting this request.

By snail-mail, I'm sending to you a signed printout of this e-formatted letter.

LARRY W. BRYANT

Copies furnished to:

Mr. McCarthy

Mark S. Zaid, Esq. (Washington, D.C.)

Chairman, U. S. Senate Select Committee on Intelligence

Cambodian Ambassador to the United States

Follow the damn money!!!!!


http://www.washingtonpost.com/wp-dyn/articles/A20191-2004Aug20.html

Bests,
John

http://bellaciao.org/en/article.php3?id_article=2974


Jonathan Bush: 911 Funding & Those Irksome White House Terrorism Report Redactions "

... tens of thousands of dollars from the Riggs bank account of Saudi Princess Haifa flowed to the families of two Saudi students who subsidized two Saudi terrorists involved in the September, 11th attacks... The Bush administration insisted on censoring sections of a 2003 Congressional report on the 2001 terrorist attack that dealt with Riggs accounts held by Saudis..."

http://www.whitehouseforsale.org/ContributorsAndPaybacks/pioneer_profile.cfm ?pioneer_ID=158

FOLLOW THE MONEY, HONEY!

Bests,
John

To PAGE 3, PAGE 5 Or HOME PAGE On The Writings Of And About John McCarthy


BACK TO POW/MIA HOME PAGE