To TNR
By
John McCarthy, May 31, 2004
Re your Article on Sibel Edmonds and the
FBI, please see the following URL. A suggested sequence of viewing documents
link is at the bottom of the latest post at unknownnews.
Larry
O'Daniel, goldencoast publishing, has run into a similar problem re
classification of documents by CIA which previously were claimed not to exist,
much less reclassified, re an FOIA request which initially went unanswered for
over two years. CIA continues to ignore all follow-up requests. Larry's
argument re CIA's reluctance to acquiesce is quite simple and honest; it should
be illegal to classify information which is treasonous in it's concept and
implementation.
Do you think Senator Grassley would put up with the
antics of the CIA and FBI, who work in concert to use the ruse of classifying
crimes against humanity, in violation of the Nuremberg Rules and Geneva
Convention, to hid treason in wartime? If the answer is yes, delete this email
immediately. If the answer is no, then do what our founding fathers designed
the First Amendment had the wisdom to proclaim when they signed the Bill of
Rights; make sure the media ferrets out the traitors in government by censuring
the government, not the citizens who heroically attempt to bring high crimes
and treason into the light of day.
The National Security Council
documents declassified by the State Department in 2000, much to the chagrin of
the CIA, are located on this site. Now we know why the CIA has been ducking
this issue for thirty seven years. In fact, the justification for reclassifying
the Sibel Edmonds' material could very well be used to reclassify all of the
material in the Blog. Unfortunately, it is on web sites around the world and
freely debated. Members of Congress and Senate have the information. Most of
the media has it, but show their fear of the various agencies by not publishing
it. To them, Freedom of The Press equates to bowing to the will of the
Intelligence Community. It's been that way for over 50 years and
counting.
Does TNR have the moral courage to bring this matter to a
screeching halt?
Have a safe Memorial Day.
Regards,
John McCarthy
Chairman of The Board of VERPA
Veterans
Equal Rights Protection Advocacy
http://www.verpa.org
To Senator Pelosi
By John McCarthy, May 21,
2004
Dear Senator Pelosi,
The following URL contains documents
and dialogue of once Top Secret National Security Council meetings declassified
by the State Department in 2000, much to the chagrin of the CIA. Now we know
why.
With the recent expose of the Pentagon's Special Access Program,
SAP, in the New Yorker Magazine, the rogue CIA Black Terror and Assassination
program titled Project Cherry is again relevant to practice and patterns of the
Intelligence Community resulting in disaster and criminal
liability.
With the reclassification of the declassified documents of
2000, the DOJ is collaborating with the CIA's current position that all
documents relating to Project Cherry are still classified from thirty eight
years ago. The problem with CIA's position in refusing FOIA release of
documents re Project Cherry is that Cherry was a rogue, CIA directed,
unilateral operation of Black Terror and Assassination in blatant and egregious
defiance of Presidential Directives issued during National Security Council
meetings.
Notification of this treasonous action resulted in President
Johnson's announcement in March, 1968, that he would not seek nor accept his
parties nomination for reelection as President of The United States.
The NSC documents are located in the Archives section of June, 2003, of the
above URL.
Attempts to reclassify these documents would constitute
further conspiracy to obstruct justice in a capital murder case. Details are in
links of the site.
Your assistance is requested in securing all
documents relating to Project Cherry (and Oak, Elm, Birch, Fir, Maple, Peach,
Pear) currently at CIA repositories, DOD repositories, National Security
Archives, NSA Repositories at Ft. Meade, MD, State Department, FBI and DIA
repositories.
The State Department has previously denied possessing any
documents related to the above only to have Pentagon's Assistant Chief of Staff
for Intelligence, ACSI, produce documents outlining the State Department's
concern over granting a security clearance to my attorney, Charles Morgan, Jr.,
for access to the top secret documents of the record of trial and allied
paperwork. This conflict has not been resolved and I bring it to your attention
should you get a further denial of document possession. Further, the State
Department asked for copies of the record of trial in June, 1968, and returned
them to my military attorney in the JAG section of the Pentagon with the
remark, "If we had known that this information was going to be disclosed at
trial, we would never allowed the case to proceed." And yet the State
Department had no records of any documents relating to this matter. The ACSI
documents, dated 1969, were located in the Pentagon in 1984.
Regards,
John McCarthy
Chairman of The Board of VERPA
Veterans Equal
Rights Protection Advocacy
http://www.verpa.org
Treachery And Treason
By John
McCarthy, May 19, 2004
Greetings,
The following URL contains
documented evidence of Treason in war time. Agencies of the US Government
continue to stonewall attempts to retrieve information under the FOIA using the
excuse of "classified" material which would affect the National Security and
Foreign Policy, while the real reason rests with the ongoing attempts to cover
high crimes and treason.
The Courts across the land continue to reject
claims of veterans because of the Feres Doctrine. The Senate Judiciary
Committee has been sitting on the Bill to abolish the Feres Doctrine for years.
With the reenactment of the Draft, the retention of the Feres Doctrine will
have negative results on prospective inductees who will be advised of the
perils and pitfalls of Feres PRIOR to taking the oath of enlistment. If
government expects to maintain a viable force in all military services, Feres
must be abolished.
http://www.unknownnews.net/040515d14jm.html
CIA
continues to claim material on rogue criminal actions is classified in spite of
the documented fact that Presidential Directives issued during National
Security Council meetings were blatantly disobeyed by the CIA, State Department
and the Department of Defense Joint Chiefs of Staff in time of war with
disastrous consequences.
CIA continues to claim material on rogue
criminal actions is classified in spite of the documented fact that
Presidential Directives issued during National Security Council meetings were
blatantly disobeyed by the CIA, State Department and the Department of Defense
Joint Chiefs of Staff in time of war with disastrous consequences.
With
respect to the current expose by Seymour Hersh of The New Yorker Magazine of
the Special Access Program in the DOD, it appears that the continuing pattern
of treason is alive and well if you discount plausible deniability by the
President.
What can the GAO do to remedy this egregious
activity?
Regards,
John McCarthy
Chairman of The Board of
VERPA
Veterans Equal Rights Protection Advocacy
Ashcroft Statement
Regarding Sibel Edmonds and "State Secrets"
By John McCarthy,
May 16, 2004
An example of not responding to "classified" FOIA Requests
from the CIA is their reply to Larry O'Daniel's request for release of all
documents concerning Project Cherry. Larry (goldencoast publishing) has
challenged the CIA's response that information of "Cherry" remains classified.
His argument is that it is illegal to classify a crime consisting of a rogue
operation specifically prohibited by Presidential Directives. I have Cc'd Larry
a copy of this email and expect he will be ready for an immediate
response.
Because we NOW KNOW that Cherry was an unauthorized, rogue
operation using Black Terror and Assassination (much like Sy Hersh's expose of
the Special Action Plan) AND it existed in defiance of Presidential Directives
issued during National Security Council meetings while using Khmer Serie
operatives in their attempt to overthrow the Cambodian Government and
Assassinate, then Prince, now King Norodom Sihanouk, we can no longer be an
unwitting party to the deception on the part of the Intelligence Community. A
pattern and modus operandi is emerging here. Although the personnel have
changed over the years, the mindset remains the same.
Larry and I are
in possession of the NSC documents downloaded from the LBJ Library. These once
Top Secret documents were declassified by the State Department in 2000, much to
the consternation of the CIA. Now we know why.
This is a perfect
example to use before the appropriate committee who must have the moral courage
and temerity to take the appropriate action.
If you compile all of the
abuses CIA has created since they decided to work outside of the charter of the
National Security Act of 1947, you will have the justification to abolish the
CIA, dismantle it's subsidiaries and start all over with an organization that
will refuse to fabricate evidence of weapons of mass destruction to justify
preemptive attacks on sovereign nations, create an atmosphere for wars of
insurrection in Third World Nations and the murder of well over 5,000,000
civilians. CIA's declaration of a "slam dunk" to the President re the WMD in
Iraq is one more horrendous and egregious blunder that approaches conspiracy to
deceive the President into ordering preemptive action.
Secretary Powell
today expressed having been given the "best information available at the time
from the CIA" for his presentation to the UN. CIA and DIA KNEW this information
was bogus or at least suspect. There may have been a demand for this
information to cause career intelligence analysts to send this "intelligence"
up the chain to the President, and the demand for justification may have come
from the White House. VP Cheney is known to have made many trips to CIA while
the "intelligence" was being "processed".
CIA activities in the Prisons
of Iraq break all the rules of the Geneva Convention and are equal to the
crimes evidenced in the Nuremberg International War Crimes Tribunal. The
definition of Aggressor War levied against Nazi Germany at the Nuremberg Trials
dovetails exactly with the preemptive attack on Iraq. Supreme Court Justice
Robert Jackson temporarily stepped down from the Court in 1945 to become the
lead prosecutor at Nuremberg. Parts of his opening statement to the Tribunal
are applicable here.
Crime Against Peace
"The basic provision
of the Charter is that to plan, prepare, initiate or wage a war of aggression,
or war in violation of international treaties (such as the UN) agreements, and
assurances, or to conspire or participate in a common plan to do so, (such as
Briton) is a crime.
"I suggest that an "Aggressor" is generally held
to be that state which is the first to commit any of the following
actions:
(1) Declaration of war on another state;
(2) Invasion
by it's armed forces, with or without a declaration of war, of the territory,
vessels or aircraft of another state;
(3) Attack it by land, naval, or
air forces, with or without a declaration of war, on the territory, vessels or
aircraft of another state.
"And I further suggest that it is the
general view that no political, military, economic or other considerations
shall serve as an excuse or justification for such actions..."
"They
(the defendants) took from the German (Iraqi) people all those dignities and
freedoms that we hold to be natural and inalienable rights in every human
being.
"We must never forget that the record on which we judge these
defendants today is the record on which history will judge us tomorrow.
"These defendants were of a station and rank which does not soil it's own hands
with blood. They were men who knew how to use lesser folk as tools. We want to
reach the planners and designers, the inciters and leaders without whose evil
architecture the world would not have for so long scourged with the violence
and wracked with agonies and convulsions of this terrible war.
"My task
is to show the scale on which these men who were in responsible positions and
who conceived the plan and design which renders them answerable, regardless of
the fact that the plan was actually executed by others.
"Any resort to
war, to any kind of war, is a resort to means that are inherently
criminal.
"Can there be no doubt that the outlawing of aggressive war
was one of the generally accepted rules of International Law in 1939? The
closing remarks from Justice Jackson follow:
"We may admit too that the
world had failed to provide political or legal remedies (such as the UN in the
case of Iraq) which would be honorable and acceptable alternatives to war. We
do not underwrite either the ethics or the wisdom of any country, including my
own, if the face of these problems. But we do say that it is now, as it was for
sometime before 1939, illegal and criminal for Germany or any other nation to
redress grievances or seek expansion by resort to aggressive war.
"The
measure of the criminality of the plan and therefore of the guilt of each
participant is, of course, the sum total of crimes committed by all in
executing the plan. But the gist of the offense is participation in the
formulation or execution of the plan. These are rules which every society has
found necessary in order to reach men, like these defendants, who never get
blood on their hands but who lay plans that result in the shedding of blood."
--7/26/1946
This above presentation before the Nuremberg Military
Tribunal War Crimes Trial is just as applicable today for the premeditated
fabrication of "intelligence" for the preemptive attack on Iraq. We know today,
without a doubt, that the sources for the bogus information collected by the
Intelligence Community were deemed suspect BEFORE it was processed into
"actionable intelligence" for presentation to Congress, The Executive
Department, and the United Nations. There was no justification for aggressive
was against Iraq. Efforts to cover addition information of other related crimes
by placing classifications and invoking "national security and foreign policy"
considerations only deepens the conspiracy to obstruct justice. These and other
actions to deceive our nation and the world deserve to be addressed by the RICO
Act.
L Fletcher Prouty's book, "The Secret Team; The CIA And It's
Allies In Control Of The United States And The World" is now available for FREE
download at: http://www.ratical.org/ratville/JFK/ST/ST.html
100,000 copies of this book were removed from the bookstore shelves across this
country, the land of the free and home of the brave. It is a primer on abuses
of the CIA and dovetails with other abuses, above, justifying the dismantling
of the Agency. It is time. The methods described in Prouty's book are still
being used today and deserve your attention. You will automatically observe how
these matters dovetail with today's situations.
At the least, CIA is
negligent in not foiling the 9-11 attack on the WTC. At worse, the crime of
treason should be closely explored. The DOJ's classification of documents is
patently inexcusable. "Sources and Methods" has been the catch all excuse for
hiding high crimes and treason for too long. We need to expose this excuse for
what it is; preventing the public from exposure to high crimes and treason.
If Congress will not hold hearings on this and other matters, we must
find another forum that will attract thousands of people and thereby the media.
The petition could include this alternative if Congress refuses to address
these issues. We should not underestimate the power and reach of the Internet.
The ICC should also be provided updated material on what we are attempting to
accomplish.
Best regards,
John McCarthy
Chairman of The
Board of VERPA
http://www.verpa.org
Top Secret
Documents Declassified
by John McCarthy, May 14,
2004
Hi Harry and Helen!
Once Top Secret documents have been
declassified by The State Department, much to the chagrin of the CIA. Now we
know why.
Presidential Directives were issued during a National
Security Council meeting ordering the CIA, State Department and the Joint
Chief's of Staff to cease and desist all support for Khmer Serie operations for
the overthrow of the Cambodian Government and the Assassination of then Prince,
now King Norodom Sihanouk.
The Intelligence Community ignored the
President resulting in disastrous consequences.
Documents of the
National Security Council can be viewed at the following URL in the Archives
Section for June 2003. When the synopsis in the following site is compared with
the above NSC documents, the acts of treason leap out at the reader. The
synopsis was written in 1998. The NSC documents date from 1965-66 and 67, but
were only declassified in 2000 and are available on the Internet, originally
from the LBJ Library. When LBJ was notified of these treasonous acts in March,
1968, he announced he would not seek nor accept his parties nomination for
reelection as President of The United States.
LINK
The following sites fill in the blanks.
LINK
LINK
LINK
LINK Letters in 21
and 22 above to Senators Kyl and Shelby remain unanswered. Ashcroft recused
himself from the Wilson/Plame Affair AFTER he received his letters.
Compare the treasonous acts by the CIA and State Department in 1966
during war time with the treasonous acts by the Intelligence Community in the
fabrication of WMD evidence presented to Congress (and the UN) seeking the war
powers act for the preemptive strike on Iraq. Then add the growing evidence of
inaction and prior knowledge of the 9/11 "sneak attack" on the WTC and I do
believe we have a Trifecta.
With the addition of the MI/CIA (OGA)
Prisoner Abuse Murder/Rape/Torture in Iraq we have a Quenelle.
There is
but one recourse (see part 2 below).
Regards,
John McCarthy
Chairman of The Board of VERPA
Veterans
Equal Rights Protection Advocacy
Top Secret
Documents Declassified (part 2)
by John McCarthy, May 18,
2004
Hi Harry and Helen!
My last posting ended with "There is
but one response". The response I have concluded to be the abolition of the CIA
and a full and open Congressional investigation.
Although many
documents have been declassified over the years, some remain classified without
justification; and the real reason is to secret that information which show
high crime.
An example of not responding to "classified" FOIA Requests
from the CIA is their reply to Larry O'Daniel's request for release of all
documents concerning Project Cherry. Larry (Goldencoast Publishing) has
challenged the CIA's response that information of "Cherry" remains classified.
His argument is that it is illegal to classify a crime consisting of a rogue
operation specifically prohibited by Presidential Directives. I have Cc'd Larry
a copy of this email and expect he will be ready for an immediate
response.
Because we NOW KNOW that Cherry was an unauthorized, rogue
operation using Black Terror and Assassination (much like today's Sy Hersh's
exposure of the Special Action Plan) AND it existed in defiance of Presidential
Directives issued during National Security Council meetings while using Khmer
Serie operatives in their attempt to overthrow the Cambodian Government and
Assassinate, then Prince, now King Norodom Sihanouk, we can no longer be an
unwitting party to the deception on the part of the Intelligence Community. A
pattern and modus operandi is emerging here. Although the personnel have
changed over the years, the mindset remains the same.
Larry and I are
in possession of the NSC documents downloaded from the LBJ Library. These once
Top Secret documents were declassified by the State Department in 2000, much to
the consternation of the CIA. Now we know why.
This is a perfect
example to use before the appropriate committee who must have the moral courage
and temerity to take the appropriate action.
If you compile all of the
abuses CIA has created since they decided to work outside of the charter of the
National Security Act of 1947, you will have the justification to abolish the
CIA, dismantle it's subsidiaries and start all over with an organization that
will refuse to fabricate evidence of weapons of mass destruction to justify
preemptive attacks on sovereign nations, create an atmosphere for wars of
insurrection in Third World Nations and the murder of well over 5,000,000
civilians. CIA's declaration of a "slam dunk" to the President re the WMD in
Iraq is one more horrendous and egregious blunder that approaches conspiracy to
deceive the President into ordering preemptive action.
Secretary Powell
today expressed having been given the "best information available at the time
from the CIA" for his presentation to the UN. CIA and DIA KNEW this information
was bogus or at least suspect. There may have been a demand for this
information to cause career intelligence analysts to send this "intelligence"
up the chain to the President, and the demand for justification may have come
from the White House. VP Cheney is known to have made many trips to CIA while
the "intelligence" was being "processed".
CIA activities in the Prisons
of Iraq break all the rules of the Geneva Convention and are equal to the
crimes evidenced in the Nuremberg International War Crimes Tribunal. The
definition of Aggressor War levied against Nazi Germany at the Nuremberg Trials
dovetails exactly with the preemptive attack on Iraq. Supreme Court Justice
Robert Jackson temporarily stepped down from the Court in 1945 to become the
lead prosecutor at Nuremberg. Parts of his opening statement to the Tribunal
are applicable here.
Crime Against Peace
"The basic
provision of the Charter is that to plan, prepare, initiate or wage a war of
aggression, or war in violation of international treaties (such as the UN)
agreements, and assurances, or to conspire or participate in a common plan to
do so, (such as Briton) is a crime.
"I suggest that an "Aggressor" is
generally held to be that state which is the first to commit any of the
following actions:
(1) Declaration of war on another state;
(2)
Invasion by it's armed forces, with or without a declaration of war, of the
territory, vessels or aircraft of another state;
(3) Attack it by land,
naval, or air forces, with or without a declaration of war, on the territory,
vessels or aircraft of another state.
"And I further suggest that it is
the general view that no political, military, economic or other considerations
shall serve as an excuse or justification for such actions..."
"They
(the defendants) took from the German (Iraqi) people all those dignities and
freedoms that we hold to be natural and inalienable rights in every human
being.
"We must never forget that the record on which we judge these
defendants today is the record on which history will judge us tomorrow.
"These defendants were of a station and rank which does not soil it's own hands
with blood. They were men who knew how to use lesser folk as tools. We want to
reach the planners and designers, the inciters and leaders without whose evil
architecture the world would not have for so long scourged with the violence
and wracked with agonies and convulsions of this terrible war.
"My task
is to show the scale on which these men who were in responsible positions and
who conceived the plan and design which renders them answerable, regardless of
the fact that the plan was actually executed by others.
"Any resort to
war, to any kind of war, is a resort to means that are inherently
criminal.
"Can there be no doubt that the outlawing of aggressive war
was one of the generally accepted rules of International Law in 1939? The
closing remarks from Justice Jackson follow:
"We may admit too that the
world had failed to provide political or legal remedies (such as the UN in the
case of Iraq) which would be honorable and acceptable alternatives to war. We
do not underwrite either the ethics or the wisdom of any country, including my
own, if the face of these problems. But we do say that it is now, as it was for
sometime before 1939, illegal and criminal for Germany or any other nation to
redress grievances or seek expansion by resort to aggressive war.
"The
measure of the criminality of the plan and therefore of the guilt of each
participant is, of course, the sum total of crimes committed by all in
executing the plan. But the gist of the offense is participation in the
formulation or execution of the plan. These are rules which every society has
found necessary in order to reach men, like these defendants, who never get
blood on their hands but who lay plans that result in the shedding of blood."
--7/26/1946
This above presentation before the Nuremberg Military
Tribunal War Crimes Trial is just as applicable today for the premeditated
fabrication of "intelligence" for the preemptive attack on Iraq. We know today,
without a doubt, that the sources for the bogus information collected by the
Intelligence Community were deemed suspect BEFORE it was processed into
"actionable intelligence" for presentation to Congress, The Executive
Department, and the United Nations. There was no justification for aggressive
was against Iraq. Efforts to cover addition information of other related crimes
by placing classifications and invoking "national security and foreign policy"
considerations only deepens the conspiracy to obstruct justice. These and other
actions to deceive our nation and the world deserve to be addressed by the RICO
Act.
L Fletcher Prouty's book, "The Secret Team; The CIA And It's
Allies In Control Of The United States And The World" is now available for FREE
download at: http://www.ratical.org/ratville/JFK/ST/ST.html
100,000 copies of this book were removed from the bookstore shelves across this
country, the land of the free and home of the brave. It is a primer on abuses
of the CIA and dovetails with other abuses, above, justifying the dismantling
of the Agency. It is time. The methods described in Prouty's book are still
being used today and deserve your attention. You will automatically observe how
these matters dovetail with today's situations.
At the least, CIA is
negligent in not foiling the 9-11 attack on the WTC. At worse, the crime of
treason should be closely explored. The DOJ's classification of documents is
patently inexcusable. "Sources and Methods" has been the catch all excuse for
hiding high crimes and treason for too long. We need to expose this excuse for
what it is; preventing the public from exposure to high crimes and
treason.
If Congress will not hold hearings on this and other matters,
we must find another forum that will attract thousands of people and thereby
the media. A petition could include this alternative if Congress refuses to
address these issues. We should not underestimate the power and reach of the
Internet. The ICC should also be provided updated material on what we are
attempting to accomplish.
Best regards,
John McCarthy
Chairman of The Board of VERPA
http://www.verpa.org/
The
previous letters are from the Unknown News
http://www.unknownnews.net/040515d14jm.html
Prisoner
Abuse
By John McCarthy, May 8, 2004
Dear Nam Nguyen,
Those who tortured the Iraqi prisoners did not act on their own
volition.
They acted on directions from their superiors.
Their
superiors were Military Intelligence and/or CIA who ran the prison
complex.
I have provided you with URL's in the past that expose the
treachery and treason of the CIA and State Department but I see you refuse to
make this information available to your readers. The mainstream media won't
print this information. But we "bloggers" have the unique opportunity to
provide the public with unfettered information. The government cannot control
the Internet. This is our opportunity to speak the truth. Let's not waste it!
The history of these agencies is graphically clear. They are the ones
who created the atmosphere for the War in Vietnam. That is the nexus of our
problem with the preemptive war in Iraq. See:
http://www.ratical.org/ratville/JFK/ST/ST.html.
This is a free download and gives the impact of CIA operations on Vietnam.
100,000 copies of this book were removed from the book store shelves across
this country. The author thought it more important to get the word out than
make a profit and that is why it is available for FREE.
Once again,
here are the documents which are available on the Internet.
The
National Security Documents once classified Top Secret are located in the
Archives section for June and July 2003. These documents were discovered in
2000 after the State Department declassified them, much to the chagrin of the
CIA. Now we know why.
http://www.fromthewilderness.com/free/hall/Mac.html
This synopsis was written before the documents of the National Security
Council, above, were discovered.
The remaining URL's fill in the
blanks.
http://www.geocities.com/larryjodaniel/17.html
http://www.geocities.com/larryjodaniel/21.html
http://www.geocities.com/larryjodaniel/22.html
http://www.geocities.com/larryjodaniel/23.html
The letters in 21 and 22 above remain unanswered. This is vital to
understanding the preemptive attack on Iraq and the subsequent disastrous
repercussions.
These are the same people who directed Dr. Richard Mason
to fabricate expert forensic pathology testimony in a Top Secret Criminal Court
Martial in Long Binh, Vietnam, on 29-30 January 1968. The guilty verdict was
rendered at 7:00 PM. The TET Offensive began 25 minutes later.
Mason
has testified in many murder trails since then and, as you know, is currently
the Santa Cruz County Coroner. I notified the Sheriff of Santa Cruz Country
last August of Mason's perjury and recantation at my trial which resulted in
the appellate court overturning a premeditated murder conviction because of
"newly found evidence and fraud on the court". Mason is a prostitute and still
employed at $150K per year.
What is wrong with this picture?
Regards,
John McCarthy
Treachery, Treason and The
Feres Doctrine
By John McCarthy, May 5, 2004
Hello
Ms. Knapp,
I just read your article on Pat Tillman. I've known allot of
"Tillman's". All of them died. They are all f--ing dead. But as long as I am
still f--ing alive, I will continue to expose the Intelligence Community for
what they are; f--ing traitors.
Sequentially, the following URL's
educate the reader in the horrors manifested by treachery and treason. It all
begins with "Be All That You Can Be.....But Be F--ing Aware".
http://www.fromthewilderness.com/free/hall/Mac.html
http://www.geocities.com/larryjodaniel/17.html
http://www.geocities.com/larryjodaniel/21.html
http://www.geocities.com/larryjodaniel/22.html
The letters in 21 and 22 above remain unanswered. AG Ashcroft recused himself
AFTER he received this f--ing letter.
http://www.geocities.com/larryjodaniel/23.html
The above URL contains National Security Council documents in
the Archives section June and July 2003. These once Top Secret documents were
declassified by the F--ing State Department in 2000, much to the chagrin of the
f--ing CIA. Now we know f--ing why.
Veterans Equal Rights Protection
Advocacy, VERPA, was established four years ago with the goal of abolishing the
Feres Doctrine. Feres was adopted by Congress and upheld by the Supreme Court
in 1950. Simply put, Feres prevents any service member or veteran from seeking
redress against the government as guaranteed by the First Amendment of the
Constitution of The United States for ANY crime "incidental to service".
VERPA does not seek to abolish Feres re wounds or death suffered in
combat.
What we are concerned with are the crimes of murder, rape,
assault, negligence, medical malpractice, medical experimentation, nuclear
experimentation, torture, false imprisonment, wrongful conviction, perjury,
witness tampering, witness intimidation, secreting exculpatory evidence, libel
and slander, conspiracy to obstruct justice, treason and more.
No one
who takes the oath of enlistment or commission is advised of the Feres
Doctrine. None are made aware of it until too late.
Current members of
the Supreme Court have opined that Feres is "bad law" and Congress has the
ability to repeal and abolish it.
With the advent of the reinstitution
of the Draft, millions of men and women between the ages of 18-34 will be
subject to induction in the Armed Forces of our Country. If Congress chooses
not to abolish Feres, certainly they would agree that all those citizens
eligible for the Draft should be advised of Feres BEFORE they are sworn in. At
least that would give the prospective inductees the informed consent NOT to
forfeit their Rights under the First Amendment and therefore avoid being
inducted.
VERPA has prepared a Bill for the Senate Judiciary Committee
with case histories on the abuses of Feres. Currently, Senator Spector and the
Committee are stonewalling our efforts which is forcing us to take the matter
before the International Crime Commission in the Hague.
If you and your
paper are not inclined to publish this information, have the f--ing courtesy to
say so because I am not going to f--ing live forever.
I have challenged
myself, and now I am challenging you.
Regards,
John
McCarthy
Chairman of The Board of VERPA
http://www.verpa.org
Black Op Radio
John McCarthy,
2002
Show #76 Featured Guest: John McCarthy
Cherry was one of
five CIA sponsored activities. John McCarthy, a team leader in Cherry, was the
Case Officer in Saigon, of a CIA directed covert operation code named PROJECT
CHERRY. The operational mission of CHERRY was a redundant, three pronged
assassination team targeted against Prince NORODOM SIHANOUK, the head of state
of Cambodia. Not until late in 2000, after the State Department declassified a
section of their records could the trail be traced proving the rogue activities
of Cherry. At the time he was involved, John had no knowledge of this rogue
activity.
Part
One
Part
Two
Part
Three
Operation
Cherry
More
on Col. Finck
http://www.blackopradio.com/archives.html
An Open Letter to Pierre
Finck
By John McCarthy, 1996
Pierre, you liar and
hypocrite:
There is no statute of limitations for conspiring to
obstruct justice in a capital murder case. Stand by for your summons. Or do you
think that being an expatriate in that neutralist haven of Switzerland will
save you. You see, Pierre, should you choose to exercise Switzerland's
non-extradition treaty with the United States, you may do so at the peril of
forfeiting your retirement check for ignoring a summons from the U.S. Congress.
Take another sip of that fine wine, Pierre.
It wasn't enough for you to
screw up the JFK autopsy and provide Arlen Specter with your expert opinion
before the Warren Commission. You had to go along with the government's faulty
desires to "get that case behind us", so we could all heal the wounds which
continue to fester 33 years later. No, Pierre, you got involved in the RFK
aftermath, and then the Panamanian Police effort which I am sure you recall,
was supervised by the CIA. Coincidence, I guess, how most knowledgeable people
think the CIA was responsible for the JFK and RFK murders also. But let's not
get presumptuous.
But perhaps we should talk about CIA black terror and
assassinations missions later.
I wonder if the Assassinations Record
and Review Board will want to grill you about the following matters as were
exposed in Probe. Perhaps they will feel, as I do, that your behavior in my
case sheds backward light on your performance at Bethesda on the night of
11/22/63.
1. What was the reasoning for involving yourself in
attempting to change the findings of a so-called expert in forensic pathology,
one Richard Mason, an Army pathologist, who had testified as the government's
first witness in a Top Secret murder trial conducted on January 29th and 30th,
1968.
2. Did you also believe that your protege, Mason, was terribly
mistaken or flat out wrong in his deduction that the wound in question was
caused by a .22 or.25 caliber projectile? Did Mason's opinion rub you the wrong
way also?
3. Did Mason's "field expedient" test leave you with the
feeling that such an experiment would not stand the scrutiny of your peers?
I'll bet you got a lump in your throat when you observed Mason's findings and
conclusion that there were microscopic particles of gunpowder residue in the
wound tract? That was a real frost for your forensic mind.
4. Were you
stupefied by Mason's testimony based on his detective-minded, non-supportive
conclusions which flew in the face of all other testimony at the trial? Is that
why you encouraged him to reevaluate his expert opinion and ultimately recant
his in-court expert testimony, in writing? Is that why you sent Mason a letter
of congratulations for changing his expert testimony? Pierre, how could you?
5. Did the post-trial review conducted a month after the trial cause
you to have some concern because the legal experts had modified Mason's
irrefutable in-court testimony by contradicting his expert opinion that it was
impossible for a .38 caliber bullet to have caused the wound in question by
concluding, "science can not say under any fact or circumstances that a .38
could not have caused the wound in question." ??? Did that bother you very
much, Pierre? Those damn lawyers can certainly make life difficult for you
experts, can't they?
6. Did you have difficulty sleeping with the
knowledge that the FBI had detected a particle of quartz stuck to the bullet
fragment that Mason had submitted to the FBI lab for analysis? Did you spill
any wine when you were advised that the bullet fragment had been lost in the
registered mail? Did it bother you in the least that the FBI could not
determine the make, caliber, or manufacturer of the bullet fragment Mason
removed from the face of the deceased? Do you recall that the FBI report was
issued nine days after the trial ended in a conviction and the sentencing of an
innocent man to life in prison? Was that the reason you needed Mason to change
his testimony and get on board with the new theory that, irrespective of
Mason's testimony, as well as that of a firearms examiner, both of whom
concluded that a .38 could not have been used to kill the deceased, that a
conviction with any theory was better than no conviction at all?
7. In
September, 1968, you received Mason's recantation of his expert testimony at
trial. You must have been happy since you sent Mason a letter of
congratulations for finally altering his testimony 8 months after trial. So you
had Mason's recantation, the FBI lab report, the autopsy protocol, the autopsy
report, Mason's original testimony, but you don't have the bullet fragment
since it was lost in registered mail. You have made Mason's recantation
available to the government prosecutors, but they choose to argue Mason's
original testimony before the Appeals Court. Why? Because only you and the
government know about his recantation. What a sensitive situation. And what do
you decide to do? You decide to say nothing until you are confronted by one of
my lawyers who asks you if you have any new information from Mason or knowledge
of where hi is located. You said you had none. This was in March of 1969. But
my lawyers did not know you were lying. They had no knowledge of either the FBI
report or Mason's altered testimony; or of your correspondence with him coaxing
him to alter the testimony and get on board with a new .38 caliber theory. How
do I know this? Because of the assignments of error submitted to the Board of
Military Review, first step in the appellate process. You see, Pierre, my
lawyers quoted your own book on forensic science in detail on the point of not
having doctors like Mason relying on unproven, untested, field expedient
"tests" like the one he did. But you probably weren't aware of us using your
own book. You were too busy testifying at Jim Garrison's trial of Clay Shaw
where you revealed the equally unbelievable bad work you supervised at
President Kennedy's autopsy.
8. Were you ware Pierre that one of your
subordinates blew your cover in the McCarthy case after your cover was blown by
Garrison in the Kennedy case? I'll set the scene for you. My lawyer was sitting
in the Pentagon cafeteria in early March of 1970. Suddenly he was joined by a
lawyer who worked for you in the Armed Forces Institute of Pathology. He
startled my attorney by asking if he had seen the McCarthy file in your office.
Recall, you had denied the existence of such a file and specific information in
it. When my lawyer said no, your colleague escorted him over to your office. He
then gave him the file from your cabinet. He cautioned him by saying there was
a sergeant down the hall, but there was a copy machine in the same room. When
my lawyer opened this file, the first page was Mason's recantation. This was
fairly forthright. He says he was mistaken about the weapon being a .22 caliber
and the wound being a contact wound, which, by the way, was the compelling
testimony leading to the original guilty verdict. The FBI lab report and your
coaxing of Mason to switch was also in the file.
Why do you think your
lawyer did this? Was he upset with your performance at the Shaw trial? Or was
it something deeper? Was this the opportunity to remedy this circus be letting
you be the fall guy for a change? Did you then feel you might be summoned to
explain your actions or did you feel secure in the knowledge that you were
still part of the "Secret Team", and therefore were untouchable? What was the
result of this discovery of this secret file? The appellate court saw it all
and they were not pleased. They focused on Mason's switch in testimony and
deemed it "newly found evidence and fraud on the court." They then reversed the
premeditated murder conviction. Why did they do so? Evidently they thought that
a pathologist should be able to recognize the difference between a .22 caliber
contact wound and a .38 caliber blast. And they couldn't accept you conduct in
attempting him to switch his story to better fit the gun that I had in my
possession at the time i.e. a frame-up on your part.
One more thing
Pierre. Richard Mason, lately of San Diego, signed an affidavit in December of
1969, stating that he had never "knowingly" kept any information from my
defense team. He swore to this in front of a notary public in San Francisco.
Does that mean he perjured himself? Probably, since Mason had written his
recantation in September of 1968. As stated above, this was located in your
files in March of 1970.
Maybe you thought that your associates in CIA
and Pentagon would forever keep this matter from being public record, exposed
to the light of day and illuminated by fact. Wrong, Pierre. And there is more
to come.
Will you come down from your Swiss chalet now, to talk to
someone besides Don Breo and JAMA?
John McCarthy April 1996
Contact John McCarthy at jmac1369@earthlink.net
Pierre Finck & the
Secret Team
From the November-December, 1995 issue (Vol. 3 No. 1) of
the PROBE
Check out this URL- What a fantastic story and interview with
John McCarthy.
http://www.webcom.com/ctka/pr1195-finck.html
From Cambodia: The Coup
excerpted from the book
The Price of
Power
Kissinger in the Nixon White House
by Seymour M. Hersh
Summit
Books, 1983, paper
Other Green Berets repeatedly told colleagues after
the 1970 coup that a highly secret Special Forces unit, known as Project Gamma,
was responsible for conducting anti-Sihanouk intelligence operations inside
Cambodia before Sihanouk's ouster. Project Gamma, formally listed as Detachment
B57, Fifth Special Forces Group in South Vietnam, used members of the Khmer
Serei and the Khmer Kampuchean Krom in its activities inside Cambodia, former
Green Beret officers said. One member of B57, Captain John J. McCarthy, Jr. was
court-martialed in T968 and sentenced to hard labor for life for killing a
Khmer Serei operative believed to be a double agent. McCarthy's conviction was
reversed in 1971, after an appeals hearing in Washington in which the Army
warned that public disclosure of evidence in the case would damage national
security. An official Army history of the Green Berets, published after the
Vietnam War, does not mention Project Gamma or Detachment B57. Although the
Pentagon has declassified much material about Green Beret crossborder
operations inside Laos and Cambodia, nothing on Project Gamma has been made
available. One former senior officer of the unit, who left South Vietnam prior
to 1970, says that Gamma utilized only ethnic Cambodians in its operations,
which were designed to gather tactical intelligence from deep inside
Cambodia-areas that the normal Green Beret cross-border operations were
forbidden to penetrate. The Cambodians involved in such missions, which
included many Khmer Serei and some Khmer Kampuchean Krom, were extremely
anti-Sihanouk, the former officer recalls, but he knew of no plans to overthrow
Sihanouk while he was involved in Gamma.
Check it out at
http://www.thirdworldtraveler.com/Kissinger/Cambodia_Coup_TPOP.html
To
PAGE 2
Or Home
Page On The Writings Of And About John McCarthy
BACK TO
POW/MIA HOME
PAGE |